1984 is a postmodernist novel following the character of Winston Smith as he navigates his way through the trouble of his 'thought-crime'. He is a low level member of the Party, who is frustrated by the oppression of the party, which watches all members of society throughout all areas of their lives. When he finally makes contact with a member of the party, Julia, and another man of importance, O'Brien, his supposed 'thought-crimes' progress beyond the simple diary in which he first announced 'Down with Big Brother', toward other, more severe, crimes. However, with the all-watching eyes of Big Brother, it is only a matter of time before they are found out.
The novel itself is a fascinating concept expressed in a delicate manner which manages to reflect the points where the almost post-apocalyptic nature of the book's world collides with the reality of modern society. Through exploring themes of truth, human nature, and even love, the novel tells Winston's story in a style that leaves you totally invested in the point of view, emotions and eventual confusion of the narrator, to the point where you can almost reach the point of understanding and sharing the beliefs, anger and frustrations of Winston's mind.
It is an excellent story to read for it's well thought out world and political system, not to mention it's interesting stance on social hierarchy and loyalty. Furthermore, the relationship between Winston and Julia is undeniably fascinating, since although they seem convinced of their love, it is less so, since it is not the other person they are attached to, but the idea of corruption and rebellion that is created by their being together.
Friday, 5 September 2014
Friday, 11 July 2014
Intentional Dissonance
Frisson: the word used to describe the moment the hair on the back of
your neck stands up when you are struck by a climax of beauty in art.
Intentional Dissonance is a book purely profound in every
way that with every page inflicts its own frisson. Not only does the post-apocalypse
piece of art make you consider the power of words, from frisson to saudade, but
also makes you consider your life as a whole. With a profoundly empty world,
where bottled emotions are taken like drugs and antique shops hold the ruins of
the statue of liberty, the story follows Jon as he tries to survive in the
microcosm of a world that has barely survived.
‘You have read this all before and you will read it again’
reads The End which opens the book, starting the loop of central character Jon’s
life. The story then tumbles from first person into third, due to Jon’s
preference to refer to himself in the third person, he explains to us, and then
begins to explain what happens when he ‘falls’.
The world in which Jon has lived in for the past ten years
has not treated him kindly, leaving him addicted to a drug called sadness despite
it being illegal, as the government instead taints the water supply with the
opposite, happiness, in order for every member of society to be forcefully induced
with it. But through the story, Jon is left to save or destroy what little of
the free world is left as it is besieged by its own governors.
However, the storyline is not what makes Intentional
Dissonance special. While reading it you must pay attention to details as the
novel explores the very concept of human emotion and survival. It can be a
difficult read, at times confusing, and without paying utmost attention it can
simply be accused of being, in extreme cases, unenjoyable. However, if you
particularly enjoy the poetics of words and what it is to be human, and are
willing to face what could even be called a literary challenge, then this book could
be excellent for you.
King Lear
The National Theatre’s presentation of King Lear presented the King’s Love Test within a modern setting, where the divide of the kingdom and the events which follow it are exceptional.
The exploration of unique staging kicked off the play, with
the fool facing the audience throughout the test, which itself suffered a mass
of waves in emotion; from Lear’s power fuelled beginning, through to the outlandish
drop into rage, every step found itself swelling with dramatics.
As the play continued the production stayed true to the
aspects of Shakespeare’s play which had always made it great. From humour, to suspense,
horror through to sorrow. Beale’s performance of the mad king excellently encapsulates
the pure power the king thinks himself drenched with in the beginning. Onwards
into the play he maintained the admirable presentation with acting that
twitched with tiny details that only grew Lear into a character the audience
could only attach to, if sorrowfully.
With a setting in a type of modern day royalty, more suited
to military than monarchy, the story stays committed to Shakespeare’s original
outline. From the famous speeches of love, through to Edgars ending lines, the story
is shown heavily but truthfully, lending to a deep understanding of the complex
turning of events as Edmund and the two sisters try to weave the world around
their fingers.
Overall, the play built a solid foundation on top of which
it built an excellent portrayal; one that was understandable, fluid and, at
times, mind-consuming. It successfully proved King Lear to be one of
Shakespeare’s greatest plays.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
